Successful dieters believe total diet replacements are best for weight loss, as crunch time approaches for legislation that could wipe out these programmes

80% of dieters believe that the best way to lose weight is through a total diet replacement (TDR) and that no other option is as successful, according to a survey of current and former TDR participants run by the European Very Low Calorie Diet (VLCD) Industry Group.

The survey demonstrates the popularity of TDRs amongst European consumers as a safe, effective way to lose weight ahead of a crucial vote on proposed legislation that risks removing TDRs from the market altogether. The legislation put forward by the European Commission sets specific rules changing how TDRs should be made, which preliminary trials carried out by the Group has found would make TDR products taste awful, have an unappealing texture, turn rancid quickly and be much more expensive for consumers.

The VLCD Industry Group is calling on MEPs to reject the proposed act ahead of a vote in plenary in the European Parliament on Wednesday 13th September, and for the European Commission to reconsider these proposed rules, in order to ensure the continued existence of TDRs, which the survey shows are by far the consumers’ favoured choice to lose weight. 76% of respondents had tried other interventions, including alternative diets such as paleo, low-carb, HCG and intermittent fasting, but stopped the diets because they didn’t lose enough weight, while 33% found the diets too difficult to follow. 69% of users joined a TDR programme specifically because they’d tried various other weight loss plans and nothing worked as well.

The survey also showed that consumers could rely on TDRs to help them keep weight off. 82% of respondents are currently maintaining all or part of their TDR weight loss, 84% feel such programmes are good value for money, and 94% feel their health and quality of life have improved since losing weight on the programme.  If the legislation is passed unchallenged, this will leave tens of thousands of obese and overweight people across Europe without one of the safest and most effective options available to lose weight, and is likely to be met with outrage from the weight loss consumer.

Professor Anthony Leeds, Medical Director of the VLCD Industry Group said:

“TDRs have proved time and time again to be effective, safe, convenient and easy to follow. They provide the public with what they need to lose weight and successfully maintain that weight loss. There is no clear rationale in depriving a significant section of the population, of this safe, tried and tested option to better their health and their lives.

It is crucial that this legislation is reconsidered and revised to ensure the continued existence of these vital products and we urge MEPs to take these issues into consideration when the time comes to vote on Wednesday.”

ENDS

Following the motion for resolution on total diet replacement products being rejected at the ENVI Committee in September 2017, with the objection being supported by 26 MEPs, rejected by 36 MEPs with one abstention, the VLCD Industry Group produced the below statement:

The debate can be viewed here.

Professor Anthony Leeds, Medical Director of the European Very Low Calorie Diet (VLCD) Industry Group said:

“The EU has misjudged this issue.  The very latest published scientific evidence shows that total diet replacement (VLCD and LCD) programmes deliver the amount of weight loss (10 to 20kg) needed to have a huge beneficial impact on Europe’s major health challenges: diabetes, osteoarthritis, and cardiovascular disease.  An EU-funded trial in six EU member-states and two others* has shown that people at risk of diabetes can reduce weight by an average 10kg using total diet replacements and over one third are no-longer pre-diabetic. The health-care cost-savings of this are mind-boggling and should have convinced more committee members to vote for this rejection of legislation.  It is deeply disappointing that this European collaborative scientific/commercial project between the UK, Sweden and Denmark, where doctors proved that elderly obese could lose 10kg and keep it off for four years, suffering less pain throughout as a consequence, has been set back when all EU countries face pressure to limit the number of knee replacement operations.

“Today’s decision will also have catastrophic effects on ordinary consumers simply wanting to manage their weight loss, and carries a very real risk of forcing them to turn to dangerous, unregulated alternatives such as illegal slimming pills or ‘fad’ diets’ in their desperation to lose weight. It goes completely against the main objective of the Food for Specific Groups regulation to enhance consumer safety, and quite simply, is very likely to escalate the already shocking public health challenge of obesity in Europe.”

“What’s perhaps most frustrating is that these rules are disproportionate and largely unsubstantiated. TDRs have always been overseen by stringent EU food regulation that complies with international standards. They are carefully designed according to scientific research which ensures they consist of compositionally sound food products that provide 100% of recommended dietary allowances, including good quality protein and essential fats. The European Food Safety Authority itself has openly admitted that some of its recommendations are based on theory rather than hard scientific evidence. This legislation is not supported by evidence showing that current compositions are anything other than safe, nor is there hard scientific evidence to show that the new changes would make them safer for consumers.”

“We supported the need for legislation on composition but our repeated requests that the scientific evidence be reconsidered before legislation was made were rebuffed. Obesity and obesity-related conditions are challenging all European countries.  A majority of committee members failed in their public duty to insist that the highest standards of scientific evidence should inform the structure of legislation and their increasingly obese constituents will have good cause to reject them at the 2019 polls.”

*Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, The Netherland, Spain and the United Kingdom, plus Australia and New Zealand.